What if paying for college didn’t leave you buried in debt before your career even started?
Student loans in the U.S. have crossed $1.7 trillion—and for many, that number isn’t just overwhelming, it’s paralyzing. Nearly 40% of borrowers were expected to default by 2023, and private loans aren’t exactly a safety net. Most require a cosigner, strong credit, and carry interest rates that can hit 14% or more. The worst part? Your payment stays the same, even if your income doesn’t.
Now imagine a different model—one where you only pay when you’re actually earning enough to do so. That’s the idea behind Income Share Agreements, or ISAs. Instead of taking on traditional debt, students agree to repay a small percentage of future income for a set time. If you’re unemployed or earning below a minimum, you don’t pay a cent.
It sounds like a fairer, more flexible option—and for many, it is. But recent action by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) shows that ISAs are not without issues. So, are they the answer to America’s student debt crisis—or just another complicated promise? Let’s break it down.
Read More: What Does the Student Loan Recertification Extension Mean for You?
What Are Income Share Agreements (ISAs) and How they Work?
Picture this: You need money for college, but you’re either maxed out on federal aid or denied a private loan because of your credit—or worse, you don’t have a willing cosigner. You’re stuck. The dream of graduating debt-free feels out of reach.
Now imagine a different offer:
“We’ll help fund your education. In return, you’ll pay us back—not with fixed interest or rigid payments, but as a small percentage of your income, and only when you’re earning enough.”
That’s the idea behind Income Share Agreements (ISAs). Instead of taking on traditional debt, you make a promise to pay a slice of your future earnings for a fixed amount of time. Think of it as your school—or a private backer—betting on your success.
Here’s how an ISA typically works, broken down simply:
- Principal: The amount you receive upfront to help pay for your education.
- Income Share Percentage: The portion of your monthly pre-tax income you’ll commit to repaying—often 2–10%.
- Payback Period: The number of months or years you’ll make payments for (usually 2 to 10 years).
- Payback Cap: The max you’ll ever repay, even if your income skyrockets. This might be 1.5x or 2x what you originally received.
- Minimum Income Threshold: If you earn below this (often $30,000/year), your payments pause. You’re not penalized for having a low salary.
What makes ISAs feel different is their flexibility. You don’t start paying until you’re making enough. And if you hit tough times—get laid off or take a lower-paying job—you’re not drowning in overdue bills or interest. That kind of risk-sharing can be a huge relief, especially for first-generation students or those pursuing uncertain career paths.
Let’s look at an example. Both Emi and Tom borrow $20,000 through an ISA. Emi gets a high-paying job and ends up paying back $38,000 over five years. Tom starts with a lower salary and pays back only $15,000 in the same time. Same contract—two very different outcomes, because ISAs scale with income.
ISA vs. Traditional Student Loan
| Feature | Income Share Agreement (ISA) | Traditional Student Loan |
|---|---|---|
| Payment Type | % of income | Fixed monthly amount |
| Interest | None | Yes – accrues over time |
| Start of Repayment | After reaching income threshold | After grace period ends |
| Risk Level | Shared by borrower and funder | Fully on borrower |
| Penalty for Low Income | None – payments pause | May go into default |
| Total Paid Back | Varies by income, capped | Fixed + interest |
| Requires Cosigner | Usually not | Often required |
Why ISAs Are Gaining Ground as a Debt-Free Alternative
For millions of students, paying for college feels less like a stepping stone—and more like a financial roadblock. You might think loans are the go-to solution, but traditional private loans can be surprisingly hard to access. Most require a cosigner with strong credit, a high credit score of your own, and the willingness to commit to interest rates that can soar as high as 14%. And even then, you’re often locked into fixed monthly payments, regardless of what you earn—or don’t.
This setup shuts out a massive group of capable students: first-generation college attendees, those with no credit history, undocumented students, or anyone whose family simply can’t afford to co-sign. For them, the system isn’t just unfair—it’s completely inaccessible.
That’s why Income Share Agreements (ISAs) are gaining momentum as a real alternative.
At their core, ISAs do something traditional loans rarely do: they trust your potential more than your paperwork. Instead of asking what you can pay now, ISAs ask what you might earn in the future—and base repayment on that. You don’t start paying until you cross a certain income threshold (say $30,000/year), and if life takes a turn—low-paying job, job loss, career break—your payments drop to zero.
This isn’t just a perk. It’s built into the DNA of how ISAs work.
They also protect you on the upside. If you do land a high-paying job, you’re still not on the hook forever. Most agreements include a repayment cap, so even if you’re making six figures, you won’t be paying for decades. Once you reach that cap or finish your payment term—you’re done. No lingering interest. No extended payback schedules. Just clean closure.
So why are ISAs catching on? Because in a system where traditional funding puts all the risk on the student, ISAs offer a rare alternative: shared risk, shared reward. For students who’ve been locked out of the system—or burned by it—that’s more than a financial model. It’s a lifeline.
ISA History and Case Studies: Do They Actually Work?
Let’s be honest—on paper, Income Share Agreements (ISAs) sound promising. But in the real world, where paychecks are unpredictable and tuition is sky-high, do they actually help students succeed?
The idea isn’t new. In fact, back in 1955, economist Milton Friedman floated a radical concept: what if investors could support a student’s education in exchange for a small slice of their future income? Think of it as buying shares in a person’s potential, not their past. No interest, no fixed repayment—just a shared outcome.
Fast forward a few decades to the 1970s, and Yale University gave Friedman’s theory a shot. Graduates entered into a collective ISA-style fund where high earners helped cover costs for those who earned less. It was bold. But when the top earners started opting out early, the rest were left paying more than they expected.
Purdue’s “Back a Boiler” Program: Numbers That Matter
In 2016, Purdue University stepped up and modernized the ISA model with its Back a Boiler program. The goal? Help students fund their education without falling into the private loan trap.
So far, the results are eye-opening:
- Over $9.5 million disbursed
- 759 contracts issued
- Funding spread across 120+ majors
What’s refreshing is that Purdue didn’t target just computer science or business majors. The ISA was open to juniors and seniors in any major—giving liberal arts students and future teachers the same shot at a less risky education.
Lambda School: Betting on Aligned Incentives
Meanwhile, in the tech bootcamp world, Lambda School (now known as Bloom Institute of Technology) took ISAs in a different direction. Students don’t pay upfront. Instead, they commit to paying 17% of their income for two years, but only if they land a job making $50,000 or more. If they don’t hit that threshold, they owe nothing. The cap? $30,000 total.
The model flips the script entirely. If Lambda doesn’t help you succeed, it doesn’t get paid. And for students wary of shady bootcamps with sky-high tuition, that alignment of risk and reward feels like a money-back guarantee with teeth.
Are Income Share Agreements Fair for All Students?
Let’s say two students walk into the same classroom—one’s studying computer science, the other, creative writing. Same tuition, same school. But if both use an Income Share Agreement (ISA) to fund their education, they’ll likely walk out with very different repayment terms.
Here’s why: ISA terms are shaped by projected income. That means your major—and the career paths it typically leads to—directly influences how much of your income you’ll share, and for how long. It’s a risk assessment, plain and simple. Fields like tech, engineering, and data science often come with lower income share percentages or shorter payback periods, while students in education, journalism, or the arts may face higher rates or longer commitments.
To some, that feels strategic. To others, it feels like penalizing students for pursuing a purpose over paycheck.
But there’s a second layer to this question of fairness: access.
Traditional private loans often shut out students with no cosigner, limited credit history, or irregular documentation. This disproportionately affects first-generation college students, undocumented individuals, and students from marginalized communities. For them, ISAs can actually open doors, because eligibility is usually based on academic progress and major—not on credit reports or parental finances.
So are ISAs fair? It depends on where you’re standing.
For high-income-potential students in in-demand fields, ISAs might mean paying less than they would on a private loan—and only when they’re financially secure. For students in lower-paying or socially-driven careers, the equation gets trickier. They may pay a larger percentage of their income over a longer period—even though they earn less.
This has raised concerns that ISAs replicate existing income inequalities, especially when terms aren’t transparent. And while providers do include caps and downside protection, that doesn’t erase the fact that repayment burdens vary by career choice—and sometimes, by race or socioeconomic background.
That said, many ISA providers are working to improve fairness by:
- Offering consistent income thresholds for payment pauses
- Publishing clear repayment caps
- Expanding access across more diverse majors
- Encouraging public-sector and service career participation
At their best, ISAs are about shared risk. But for that to work fairly, everyone needs to know the rules—before they sign.
Explore it too: Student Loans and the Gender Pay Gap: A Double Burden
Legal & Regulatory Landscape: Still the Wild West?
If you’ve ever tried to read the fine print on a student loan agreement, you know how murky and intimidating the financial world can be. Now imagine diving into something even newer—like an Income Share Agreement (ISA)—with even less regulation and even fewer rules. That’s where students currently find themselves: standing in a financial gray area with no map.
For a while, ISA providers confidently claimed, “We’re not loans. We’re different. Better.” But in 2021, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) stepped in and said—not so fast. One major ISA provider, Better Future Forward, was hit with enforcement action for misleading students about what they were signing up for. The CFPB ruled that these agreements are loans under federal law, and they need to be treated—and regulated—as such.
That meant clearer disclosures, no hidden penalties, and no more pretending this wasn’t real debt. The takeaway? Just because ISAs work differently doesn’t mean they’re exempt from consumer protections.
Since then, the regulatory ground has shifted—but not enough. A few attempts have been made to create more structure. For example, the Investing in Student Success Act aimed to set national standards: capping repayment amounts, setting fair income thresholds, and making the fine print easier to understand. In California, Assembly Bill 154 proposed a pilot ISA program in public universities to test how these agreements could work under clearer oversight.
Promising, yes—but here’s the catch: none of these bills have become law yet. So right now, we’re still in the Wild West phase.
That means there’s no standard rulebook. One provider might clearly explain your cap and pause payments if your income dips. Another might bury the most important terms behind legal jargon and lock you into unexpected outcomes. For students trying to make smart, informed decisions, that’s a real problem.
So, are students protected right now? Honestly, not well enough. Without consistent oversight, you’re relying on each provider’s version of “best practices.” Some are fair and transparent. Others… not so much.
Until the laws catch up, every student considering an ISA needs to approach it like signing a contract for a long-term relationship. Ask questions. Get clarification. Know your rights. Because right now, there’s potential—but also plenty of room for mistakes.
Criticisms and Concerns: Are ISAs Just “Debt in Disguise”?
On the surface, Income Share Agreements (ISAs) sound like the breath of fresh air student financing desperately needs. No interest. No crushing monthly bill. No payment unless you’re earning. What’s not to love?
Well, as it turns out—a few things.
Let’s start with the elephant in the room: Are ISAs just another type of debt wrapped in nicer language?
Critics think so. Some argue that ISAs market themselves as a modern, student-first alternative—but in reality, they still create a financial obligation with long-term consequences. And when providers fail to clearly explain repayment caps or how much a student could actually end up paying, the lack of transparency begins to feel less like an oversight—and more like a red flag.
Counterpoint? Many ISA providers now openly display repayment calculators, income thresholds, and maximum caps. Some even go as far as publishing example scenarios (like Emi and Tom’s) to help students understand the real cost. But the inconsistency across the industry still leaves room for confusion—and that’s a real concern.
Do ISAs Discriminate Against Some Students?
Here’s a tricky but important point: ISA terms are based on projected income, which is often calculated using your major, school, and sometimes your demographic data. That means students in fields with historically lower pay—think education, social work, or the arts—may face higher income share percentages or longer repayment terms.
That has led to accusations that ISAs unintentionally punish liberal arts students and could even replicate racial or socioeconomic bias baked into income forecasting models.
Are these concerns valid? Absolutely. But it’s also worth noting that ISAs, when done right, can provide access to students who wouldn’t qualify for private loans at all—like first-gen students, those without a cosigner, or people with nontraditional academic backgrounds.
The problem isn’t the concept. It’s the execution—and the need for regulation to ensure fairness.
ISAs and the “Indentured Servitude” Debate
Now this one’s a little dramatic—but let’s talk about it.
Some critics liken ISAs to modern-day indentured servitude—a system where people “work off” what they owe over time. The idea of sharing a slice of your income for years can feel… well, uncomfortable. Especially if that income goes up and you’re locked into giving away a big chunk.
But let’s be clear: you’re not forced to work under an ISA. You’re not bound to a specific employer. You’re not penalized if your income is low. And if you decide to take a year off or pivot careers? As long as your earnings are under the threshold—you owe nothing.
That’s not servitude. That’s income-based accountability—and it’s arguably more forgiving than a fixed monthly payment you can’t afford to miss.
So, what’s the Verdict?
ISAs are not perfect. Some providers have stumbled. Others have grown quickly without enough transparency. But the core idea—that education should be funded in a way that scales with your success—isn’t broken. It just needs guardrails, oversight, and honest conversations.
Because when done responsibly, ISAs aren’t a trap. They’re a shift in power—from lenders who collect no matter what, to students who only repay when they’re in a position to do so.
So, Are ISAs the Answer to the Student Debt Crisis?
Let’s not sugarcoat it—America’s student loan system is broken. Borrowers are defaulting, interest is ballooning, and too many students are starting adult life from behind. So the natural question is: could Income Share Agreements (ISAs) be the fix we’ve been waiting for?
Well, it depends.
On the plus side, ISAs bring something long missing from student finance—flexibility. You don’t start paying until you’re earning. There’s no interest in quietly snowballing in the background. And unlike private loans, no cosigner is required. For students locked out of the traditional system, that alone can be life-changing.
There’s also the idea of shared risk. If your income is low, your payments pause. If your income grows, you pay more—but within a capped limit. It’s not just repayment—it’s repayment that respects reality.
But ISAs aren’t perfect. For one, your total repayment can still end up being more than what you borrowed—especially if you’re a high earner. And because the legal system hasn’t quite caught up, ISAs exist in a regulatory gray zone, where some protections depend entirely on the provider’s ethics, not federal law.
So—are ISAs the answer?
Maybe not the only one. But they’re a bold step in the right direction—especially for students who’ve been underserved by the current loan system. They’re not a silver bullet. But they’re a signal: that education funding should finally start working for students, not just lenders.
When Does an ISA Make Sense for You?
ISAs aren’t one-size-fits-all—and they shouldn’t be. But there are very real situations where they make a lot of sense, especially if you’re facing limited or risky loan options.
Here are a few scenarios where an ISA might be your smartest move:
- You’re a bootcamp student without access to federal financial aid. Since most coding or tech bootcamps aren’t accredited, ISAs may be one of the only options besides upfront cash.
- You’re a junior or senior undergrad who’s maxed out federal aid or can’t secure a cosigner for a private loan. ISAs can help you cross the finish line without locking you into interest-heavy debt.
- You’re a grad student hitting federal loan caps and want a flexible alternative to private lenders. Some ISAs may offer less financial pressure while you ramp up your post-grad career.
ISA vs Federal vs Private Loan: Quick Decision Checklist
| Question | Federal Loan | Private Loan | ISA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Need a cosigner? | No | Usually yes | Usually no |
| Interest rates? | Fixed or income-based | Varies; can be high | None—income share instead |
| Payments adjust to income? | Sometimes (IDR plans) | No | Yes |
| Forgiveness options? | Yes (PSLF, IDR) | No | No—but capped repayment |
| Protection if unemployed? | Some deferment/forbearance | Risk of default | Payments pause automatically |
| Ideal for… | Most students | High-credit borrowers | Students with no access to other aid |
Final Thoughts
No one should have to roll the dice just to afford a college degree.
With student debt at crisis levels, we need real solutions—and fast. Income Share Agreements (ISAs) aren’t perfect, but they offer something different: a way to fund your future without betting everything on it.
But with that comes responsibility. Students deserve transparency, fair terms, and real choices. Whether it’s a loan, an ISA, or a grant, the most important thing is knowing exactly what you’re signing up for.
Because funding your education shouldn’t feel risky—it should feel like a step forward.
FAQs
How do income share agreements work?
An Income Share Agreement, or ISA, helps you pay for school now and repay later—but only if you’re earning enough. You agree to share a small percentage of your income for a few years. If your salary drops or you lose your job, payments pause automatically. There’s no interest, and you’ll never pay more than the agreed cap.
How do income share agreements work with YeloFunding?
YeloFunding’s ISA model is simple: they fund your education, and you repay only when you’re earning above a set amount. Payments are flexible, income-based, and capped—so you’ll never overpay. If life throws a curveball, your payments stop until you’re back on track. It’s designed for students who need freedom, not pressure.
What are income share agreements?
Income Share Agreements are a student-friendly way to finance education without taking on traditional debt. Instead of interest and fixed payments, you repay a portion of your income—but only if you’re making enough. Payments scale with your success, and if things don’t go as planned, you’re not stuck. It’s funding with flexibility built in.
What schools offer income share agreements?
A few schools like Purdue University, University of Utah, and Lackawanna College offer ISA programs to help students avoid private loans. These schools use ISAs to make education more accessible, especially for those without cosigners or good credit. Each program has its own rules, so it’s worth checking the details before signing.
What colleges offer income share agreements?
Colleges like Purdue, Colorado Mountain College, and others are stepping up with ISAs as an alternative to traditional student loans. These agreements give students breathing room by tying repayment to future income, not rigid schedules. They’re not yet widespread, but more colleges are exploring ISAs as a better way to fund education.
